The Dying Light?
The Québec election results from Monday night can be interpreted as a defeat for the sovereignist cause. I thought that this would be largely a "Rest-of-Canada" interpretation, but this interpretation is shared by some prominent Québecers.
It is too early to announce the death of the sovereignist cause in Québec: The reigning politically correct consensus here is a culture that sees all federal acts through a Québec-centric lens. This is normal, and all provincial governments do it. Yet in Québec, this provincialism is easily whipped into indignant cries, reminiscent of myriad historical wrongs. We take only as example the "fiscal imbalance" issue: Nobody knows what it means, but they know enough to understand that Ottawa is screwing Québecers out of their hard-earned money. Yet it is not obvious why Ottawa should lean in to massage and pamper the deeply ensconced Québec City bureacracy and its oafish welfare apparatus.
Although it is early to announce its death, I suspect that the cause of sovereignty is in a downward trend. Young Québecers are less wedded to the cause. The nation-state as a symbol is losing its meaning in an increasingly travelled, wired and communicated world. The idea that Québec could flourish as an independent state is not entirely credible, and most people seem to know that.
On a related topic, a great sovereignist and unmatched orator has announced his retirment from the House of Commons. I used to watch with awe when Michel Gauthier would give speeches in the House of Commons. As an orator, he had no equal in the House. He was the man. He could light the chairs on fire with his speech and stare down wild beasts with his eyes. I see his retirement as another sign of the times, a generation of sovereignists that are moving on. The pity is that the House has never needed great orators more than now. The art of speechgiving in politics was lost the day that fax machines were installed in the lobbies behind the curtains of the lower Chamber. Without fiery sovereignist orators, where will we find our amusement? I guess Rick Mercer's rants will have to do.
It is too early to announce the death of the sovereignist cause in Québec: The reigning politically correct consensus here is a culture that sees all federal acts through a Québec-centric lens. This is normal, and all provincial governments do it. Yet in Québec, this provincialism is easily whipped into indignant cries, reminiscent of myriad historical wrongs. We take only as example the "fiscal imbalance" issue: Nobody knows what it means, but they know enough to understand that Ottawa is screwing Québecers out of their hard-earned money. Yet it is not obvious why Ottawa should lean in to massage and pamper the deeply ensconced Québec City bureacracy and its oafish welfare apparatus.
Although it is early to announce its death, I suspect that the cause of sovereignty is in a downward trend. Young Québecers are less wedded to the cause. The nation-state as a symbol is losing its meaning in an increasingly travelled, wired and communicated world. The idea that Québec could flourish as an independent state is not entirely credible, and most people seem to know that.
On a related topic, a great sovereignist and unmatched orator has announced his retirment from the House of Commons. I used to watch with awe when Michel Gauthier would give speeches in the House of Commons. As an orator, he had no equal in the House. He was the man. He could light the chairs on fire with his speech and stare down wild beasts with his eyes. I see his retirement as another sign of the times, a generation of sovereignists that are moving on. The pity is that the House has never needed great orators more than now. The art of speechgiving in politics was lost the day that fax machines were installed in the lobbies behind the curtains of the lower Chamber. Without fiery sovereignist orators, where will we find our amusement? I guess Rick Mercer's rants will have to do.